The findings of the study clearly indicate that context needs to be examined
thoroughly before any input. Secondly, due care is required in the selection of
questions for evaluation and the tool must be tailor made. Thirdly, the process must be
transparent and objective in nature. The reporting should include the follow up
required so that the utility of the programme may be established. Finally post
evaluation effect must be observed for improvement in future. Though the study is
based on a specific programme of a university, the structure and findings can be
replicated in other context as well