Conclusions
The results suggest that talk is important for sharing, clarifying, and distributing scientific
ideas among peers while asking questions, hypothesizing, explaining, and formulating
ideas together all appear to be important mechanisms during discussions. The use
of writing appears to be important for refining and consolidating these new ideas with
prior knowledge. These two modalities appear to be dialectical: talk is social, divergent,
and generative, whereas writing is personal, convergent, and reflective. Moreover, writing
appears to enhance the retention of co-constructed knowledge over time. Gender and ability
are important variables that may be mediating the effects of talk and writing that should
be investigated in a more robust future study.
ConclusionsThe results suggest that talk is important for sharing, clarifying, and distributing scientificideas among peers while asking questions, hypothesizing, explaining, and formulatingideas together all appear to be important mechanisms during discussions. The useof writing appears to be important for refining and consolidating these new ideas withprior knowledge. These two modalities appear to be dialectical: talk is social, divergent,and generative, whereas writing is personal, convergent, and reflective. Moreover, writingappears to enhance the retention of co-constructed knowledge over time. Gender and abilityare important variables that may be mediating the effects of talk and writing that shouldbe investigated in a more robust future study.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..