generationsRepresentative effects on body length of the parental BaP dietary exposure are provided in Fig. 2. In the F1 generation, body length significantly decreased from 3.8 ± 0.02 mm in the control groupto 3.5 ± 0.1 mm in the medium and high dose groups (Fig. 3A). Inthe F2 generation, body length was not different between groups(Fig. 3A).Moreover, the medium dose group which was significantly smaller in the F1 generation than control was significantly longerin the F2 generation (3.8 ± 0.04 mm) than the F1 medium dosegroup. Body length defects were restored in the F2 generation andremained restored in the F3 generation without significant differ-ences between groups