Fostered connections between schools and homes
were found to exist and pivotally are considered
important in all eight countries where the research
was conducted. The actual practices varied and
were both dependent upon and embedded in the
specific local contexts. Nevertheless, there were
three elements present in most descriptions of
what teachers felt were successful contacts between
schools and homes. The first element was the need
for channels or modes of communication that are
accessible to parents and manageable for teachers.
The second element was the need for two-way
dialogue or communication. The third element
concerned respect for parents’ home language(s).
The first element referred to the means, mode or
channel for communication which was established
between the school and the family or parents. The
vehicles used for communication were often based
on traditions that have been in place for decades
or more. Some communication was primarily oral
and face-to-face, or by telephone, whereas other
communication was primarily in written form. The
modes varied depending upon the culture of the
teachers and parents and the specific context of
the school. For example, in some schools face-toface
contact included the drop-off and pick-up
of the children, which varied depending upon both
the expectations of parents and the architecture
of the school. In other settings the most frequent
communication was a monthly phone call between
the schools and parents. There were also meetings,
conferences, and events, such as awards ceremonies.
In a number of different contexts there also existed
a two-way dialogue in the form of a handwritten diary
or notebook which travelled back-and-forth with the
child. This notebook or diary would have information
written from the teacher and it would go home.
But importantly there was also a space for the parents
to write information that they needed to convey to
the teacher about their child.
Fostered connections between schools and homeswere found to exist and pivotally are consideredimportant in all eight countries where the researchwas conducted. The actual practices varied andwere both dependent upon and embedded in thespecific local contexts. Nevertheless, there werethree elements present in most descriptions ofwhat teachers felt were successful contacts betweenschools and homes. The first element was the needfor channels or modes of communication that areaccessible to parents and manageable for teachers.The second element was the need for two-waydialogue or communication. The third elementconcerned respect for parents’ home language(s).The first element referred to the means, mode orchannel for communication which was establishedbetween the school and the family or parents. Thevehicles used for communication were often basedon traditions that have been in place for decadesor more. Some communication was primarily oraland face-to-face, or by telephone, whereas othercommunication was primarily in written form. Themodes varied depending upon the culture of theteachers and parents and the specific context ofthe school. For example, in some schools face-tofacecontact included the drop-off and pick-upof the children, which varied depending upon boththe expectations of parents and the architectureof the school. In other settings the most frequentcommunication was a monthly phone call betweenโรงเรียนและผู้ปกครอง นอกจากนี้ยังมีการประชุมสัมมนา และกิจกรรม รางวัลในบริบทที่แตกต่างกันมียังอยู่บทสนทนาสองทางในรูปแบบของไดอารี่ที่เขียนด้วยลายมือหรือสมุดบันทึกซึ่งเดินทางกลับ และไปกับการเด็ก สมุดบันทึกหรือไดอารี่นี้จะมีข้อมูลเขียนจากครู และจะกลับบ้านแต่ที่สำคัญมียังเป็นพื้นที่สำหรับผู้ปกครองการเขียนข้อมูลที่พวกเขาต้องถ่ายทอดให้ครูเกี่ยวกับลูก
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
