หน้า 6
one person,there is no guarantee that those person deserved their fate. So it' a phenomenl gamble.
Drones are Obama's weapon of choice because they don't result in U.S. casulties. "it is the politically advantageous thing to do low cost, no U.S. gives the appearance of toughness, according to former Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair. " it plays well domestically, and it is unpopular only in other countries. Any damage it does to the national interest only shows up over the long term. " Part of the damage, as Flynn pointed out, is that dronen make the fallen into martyrs. They create "a new reason to fight us even harder, " he said.
The United Nations charter's mandate for peaceful resolution of disputes and prohibition of military force except in self-defense is not a pipe dream. A study by the Rand Corp. concluded that between 1968 and 2006, 43 percent of incidents involving terrorist groups ended by a " peaceful political resolotion with their government, " 40 percent "were penetrated and eliminated by local police and intelligence agencies, "and only seven percent were ended by the use of military force.
Nevertheless, The Wall Street Journal reported that the military plans to increase drone flights by 50 percent by 2019.
In describing how the special operation community views the prospective targets for assassination by drone, “The Drone Papers” source said, “They have no rights. They have no dignity. They have no humanity to themselves. They’re just ‘selector’ to an analyst. You eventually get to a point in the target’s life cycle that you are following them, you don’t even refer to them by their actual name.
หน้า 6one person,there is no guarantee that those person deserved their fate. So it' a phenomenl gamble.Drones are Obama's weapon of choice because they don't result in U.S. casulties. "it is the politically advantageous thing to do low cost, no U.S. gives the appearance of toughness, according to former Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair. " it plays well domestically, and it is unpopular only in other countries. Any damage it does to the national interest only shows up over the long term. " Part of the damage, as Flynn pointed out, is that dronen make the fallen into martyrs. They create "a new reason to fight us even harder, " he said. The United Nations charter's mandate for peaceful resolution of disputes and prohibition of military force except in self-defense is not a pipe dream. A study by the Rand Corp. concluded that between 1968 and 2006, 43 percent of incidents involving terrorist groups ended by a " peaceful political resolotion with their government, " 40 percent "were penetrated and eliminated by local police and intelligence agencies, "and only seven percent were ended by the use of military force.Nevertheless, The Wall Street Journal reported that the military plans to increase drone flights by 50 percent by 2019. อธิบายถึงวิธีชุมชนดำเนินการพิเศษมุมมองเป้าหมายคาดหวังสำหรับการลอบสังหาร โดยเสียงพึมพำ "เดอะเสียงพึมพำเอกสาร" ว่า "ไม่มีสิทธิ มีศักดิ์ศรีไม่ มีมนุษย์ไม่ให้ตัวเอง พวกเขากำลังเพียงแค่ 'ตัวเลือก' การวิเคราะห์การ คุณก็ได้ไปยังจุดในวงจรชีวิตของเป้าหมายที่มีต่อ คุณจะไม่อ้างถึง ด้วยชื่อจริง
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..