In order to understand the possible role of rice grain composition
on the flour functionality, protein, fat and apparent amylose
content (AAC) of the rice flour varieties were determined (Table 2).
There was a significant difference in the chemical composition
among all the varieties especially in the protein content, which
ranged from 5.4 to 8.0 g of protein per 100 g of flour. The F09 followed
by INIAP 14 and INIAP 17 showed the highest amount of
protein. Apparent amylose content varied between 22.7 and 28.1 g
per 100 g of flour. Thus, all varieties could be considered as intermediate
to high amylose content, in agreement with values reported
for long-grain rice (Wani et al., 2012). The highest value was
found in the INIAP 17 and F09. On the other hand, the fat content
ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 g of fat per 100 g of flour. No significant
difference in AAC and lipid content were found among INIAP 14,
INIAP 15 and INIAP 16.
In order to understand the possible role of rice grain compositionon the flour functionality, protein, fat and apparent amylosecontent (AAC) of the rice flour varieties were determined (Table 2).There was a significant difference in the chemical compositionamong all the varieties especially in the protein content, whichranged from 5.4 to 8.0 g of protein per 100 g of flour. The F09 followedby INIAP 14 and INIAP 17 showed the highest amount ofprotein. Apparent amylose content varied between 22.7 and 28.1 gper 100 g of flour. Thus, all varieties could be considered as intermediateto high amylose content, in agreement with values reportedfor long-grain rice (Wani et al., 2012). The highest value wasfound in the INIAP 17 and F09. On the other hand, the fat contentranged from 0.5 to 1.0 g of fat per 100 g of flour. No significantdifference in AAC and lipid content were found among INIAP 14,INIAP 15 and INIAP 16.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
