In its recast form (2), it becomes clear that Beal’s conjecture is a generalization of Fermat’s Last Theorem [3]
where Fermat’s Last Theorem is the special case of Beal’s conjecture where x = y = z = n . In the parlance of
mathematics, Beal’s conjecture is a corollary to Fermat’s Last Theorem.
The proof that we present demonstrates that the triple ( A, B,C) can not be co-prime. This is the same
method that we used in our “simple, and much more general Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem’’ [1]. Actually, the
present proof is a generalization of the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem presented in [1].
The synopsis of this reading is as follows. In §(2), we provide a pivotal lemma that is necessary for our
argument. In §(3), we provide the short proof of Beal’s Conjecture and thereafter in §(4), we give a general
discussion and the conclusion drawn thereof.
In its recast form (2), it becomes clear that Beal’s conjecture is a generalization of Fermat’s Last Theorem [3]
where Fermat’s Last Theorem is the special case of Beal’s conjecture where x = y = z = n . In the parlance of
mathematics, Beal’s conjecture is a corollary to Fermat’s Last Theorem.
The proof that we present demonstrates that the triple ( A, B,C) can not be co-prime. This is the same
method that we used in our “simple, and much more general Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem’’ [1]. Actually, the
present proof is a generalization of the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem presented in [1].
The synopsis of this reading is as follows. In §(2), we provide a pivotal lemma that is necessary for our
argument. In §(3), we provide the short proof of Beal’s Conjecture and thereafter in §(4), we give a general
discussion and the conclusion drawn thereof.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
