The present article reports three studies illuminating the conditions under which revenge targeted at a different person than the original transgressor (i.e., displaced revenge) has hedonic benefits for avengers. More precisely, we tested the hypothesis that displaced revenge can be “sweet” for the avenger when the transgressor and the target of one's revenge both belong to a highly entitative group. Across three studies this hypothesis received support for justicerelated satisfaction but not for feelings of regret. Avengers experienced greater satisfaction after taking displaced revenge when the transgressor's group was high (vs. low) in entitativity. Interestingly, when the group was highly entitative, there was no difference between direct and displaced revenge in Study 2. These results show that revenge that is directed against seemingly innocent third-party targets can actually have hedonic benefits and achieve a state of re-established justice in the eyes of victims. This notion is further corroborated by an internal meta-analysis, which demonstrates the robustness of this effect across our three studies.