If we control for log GDP per capita and reserves in the corruption regression, the independent variables are jointly significant, but nine of the variables are individually significant. In the same regression for rule of law, only the level of reserves is significant (but with a negative sign.) Judicial efficiency, the Flemings corporate governance measure, and the measure of anti-director rights are not significant. Log GDP per capita is significant in several specifications; given that it is highly correlated with the general legal environment, it could be picking up the strength of some institutions (although probably not anti-director rights).