However, while an evaluation can reduce the degree of emphasis on systematic assessment,
it cannot neglect it. Lack of systematic inquiry and documentation can threaten the integrity and
credibility of the evaluation, lessening the likelihood that it can lead to empowering changes
in the program (Guba & Lincoln, 1989). An evaluator can take on the bulk of responsibility
for conducting the systematic aspects of evaluation with input from the stakeholders, instead
of delegating this component out to stakeholders who are not committed to it. This balances
the stakeholders’ need for assistance with analysis and documentation, while respecting their
rights to have their perspectives acknowledged and acted upon.