Figure 2 shows that, for secondary outcomes, BI scores
increased significantly at Week 6 compared with baseline
in both groups (P=0.008 and P=0.025 in TTM and PT
groups, respectively), but no difference was found between
the groups (P=0.805). Figure 3 illustrates the psychological
aspects; anxiety scores in the TTM group had decreased at
Week 6 compared with baseline scores (P=0.083), while
the anxiety scores in the PT group had increased at Week 6
(P=0.624). However, there was no difference in the scores
when the two groups were compared (P=0.144). Figure 4
shows the depression scores after treatment. The depres-
sion scores in the TTM group had decreased at Week 6
compared with baseline scores but were not significantly
Figure 2 shows that, for secondary outcomes, BI scoresincreased significantly at Week 6 compared with baselinein both groups (P=0.008 and P=0.025 in TTM and PTgroups, respectively), but no difference was found betweenthe groups (P=0.805). Figure 3 illustrates the psychologicalaspects; anxiety scores in the TTM group had decreased atWeek 6 compared with baseline scores (P=0.083), whilethe anxiety scores in the PT group had increased at Week 6(P=0.624). However, there was no difference in the scoreswhen the two groups were compared (P=0.144). Figure 4shows the depression scores after treatment. The depres-sion scores in the TTM group had decreased at Week 6compared with baseline scores but were not significantly
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..