I understand that you can not accept this claim, but what I try to explain to you is that .
1. Since we have shifted transition from the JUMP system to the CMMS system, we need to include all parts of the old system. Without not reference the invoice.
2. we are opened we use parts according to the system's activation by piece is called into use with the present parts
3. Piece mentioned that we can not determine whether a piece of any invoice remaining somewhat this is why we find abnormalities in the timing differences for claims 8D15017WS are acceptable. The claim was denied, according to the agreed time schedule too demanding , but why we call 8D report from a vendor that. To prevent crashes and over again and I understood that this claim is not a problem because of claims that were previously on.