For the purposes of this study, PABAK or Kappa scores greater than 0.61 were considered an indicator of a good degree of agreement between reactions toward the fake and the real dogs. When interpreting the results, the following guidelines were used: for behaviors which were not rare or extremely common (approximately 20–80% prevalence), the positive and negative agreement, as well as Cohen’s Kappa and PABAK were examined. When prevalence rates were very high or low, PABAK as well as positive and negative agreement provided more useful information