The results of analysis, of factors influencing the decision of the respondents, showed that the
decision on the choice of insurance coverage option is not related to gender and level of education.
One effect is the inclusion of respondents to a certain income groups. Clients belonging
to the lowest and highest income groups analyzed would choose option C - it is therefore a
rational decision, and the remaining respondents would choose the B variant. The fact of the
respondents belonging to the highest income group can be explained by that, that they do
not address the issue of price of insurance. For the lowest income group that cannot be said,
and therefore the circumstances leading to the selection of this option should be subjected to
further research.
The second group of those hypotheses was consisted by those, whose the main objective was
to determine whether in the case of perfect information, the consumer decides rationally. This
fact has been inferred from the hypotheses:
H3: The decision about changing the option of insurance, in relation with discount of the product is not affected
by the original rational (option C) or irrational option (option A) of the client.
H4: The decision about changing the option of insurance, in relation with changing scope of benefits is not
affected by the original rational (option C) or irrational option (option A) of the client.
Both hypotheses were confirmed. This means that change of decision about the choice of
insurance options at a discount and to change the scope of insurance coverage is independent
of whether the client initially chose rationally (option C) or irrationally (option A). Rational
decision of autonomous systems in one situation does not endorse the model of rational consumer
behavior.
The latest ranges of hypotheses are those that specify the circumstances of choice for the irrational
option of product (the chosen options A and B) in relation to selected social factors.
H5: Irrational consumer choice in the case of perfect information is independent of the client’s gender.
H6: Irrational consumer choice in the case of perfect information is independent of client level of education.
The results of hypothesis testing showed that irrational consumer choice in the case of perfect
information in case of accidental death is independent of gender and education level. The
results of the hypotheses are summarized in the following table 18. There are factors which
affect the client’s decision. Effective tools, which can attract customers, are discounts and the
change of insurance cover. This attractiveness is strong enough to disrupt people’s rational
decision (see chapter “Rationally behaving consumer”
The results of analysis, of factors influencing the decision of the respondents, showed that thedecision on the choice of insurance coverage option is not related to gender and level of education.One effect is the inclusion of respondents to a certain income groups. Clients belongingto the lowest and highest income groups analyzed would choose option C - it is therefore arational decision, and the remaining respondents would choose the B variant. The fact of therespondents belonging to the highest income group can be explained by that, that they donot address the issue of price of insurance. For the lowest income group that cannot be said,and therefore the circumstances leading to the selection of this option should be subjected tofurther research.The second group of those hypotheses was consisted by those, whose the main objective wasto determine whether in the case of perfect information, the consumer decides rationally. Thisfact has been inferred from the hypotheses:H3: The decision about changing the option of insurance, in relation with discount of the product is not affectedby the original rational (option C) or irrational option (option A) of the client.H4: The decision about changing the option of insurance, in relation with changing scope of benefits is notaffected by the original rational (option C) or irrational option (option A) of the client.Both hypotheses were confirmed. This means that change of decision about the choice ofinsurance options at a discount and to change the scope of insurance coverage is independentof whether the client initially chose rationally (option C) or irrationally (option A). Rationaldecision of autonomous systems in one situation does not endorse the model of rational consumerbehavior.The latest ranges of hypotheses are those that specify the circumstances of choice for the irrationaloption of product (the chosen options A and B) in relation to selected social factors.H5: Irrational consumer choice in the case of perfect information is independent of the client’s gender.H6: Irrational consumer choice in the case of perfect information is independent of client level of education.The results of hypothesis testing showed that irrational consumer choice in the case of perfectinformation in case of accidental death is independent of gender and education level. Theresults of the hypotheses are summarized in the following table 18. There are factors whichaffect the client’s decision. Effective tools, which can attract customers, are discounts and thechange of insurance cover. This attractiveness is strong enough to disrupt people’s rationaldecision (see chapter “Rationally behaving consumer”
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
