evement classified as knowledge comprehension, application, and analysis; Part B measured achievement classified
as synthesis and evaluation. Group means on Part A were compared using a
one-factor analysis of variance; significant differences were found favoring the
4MAT group (F 1, 44 = 4.06 p < .05). Student performance on Part B was scored
by raters; group means were compared using a one-factor analysis of variance.
There were no significant differences between the means on Part B (p > .05).