Factor Analysis presented in Table 7 has reduced the five
incentives into two factors. First factor may be called as
Wider Readership and consists of factors namely, Wider
Exposure, Quick Dissemination, and Audience Accessibility,
and Second factor encompass the variables dealing with
the Quality Aspect, containing factors namely, Reviewer
Comments Posted and Counted Among Quality Publications.
The variable to be included in a particular factor
depends on the value of its coefficient. The cut-off limit is
usually 0.5. First Factor consists of variables whose coeffi-
cients take values more than 0.5. It can be seen from Table
7 that the coefficient of variables representing Factor 1,
i.e., Wider Exposure, Quick Dissemination, and Audience
Accessibility are 0.692, 0.733, and 0.839, respectively
(Column 2). Similarly, Factor 2 is being represented by
Reviewer Comments Posted and Counted Among Quality
Publications whose coefficients are 0.836 and 0.705
respectively (Table 7; Column 3).
Factor Analysis presented in Table 7 has reduced the fiveincentives into two factors. First factor may be called asWider Readership and consists of factors namely, WiderExposure, Quick Dissemination, and Audience Accessibility,and Second factor encompass the variables dealing withthe Quality Aspect, containing factors namely, ReviewerComments Posted and Counted Among Quality Publications.The variable to be included in a particular factordepends on the value of its coefficient. The cut-off limit isusually 0.5. First Factor consists of variables whose coeffi-cients take values more than 0.5. It can be seen from Table7 that the coefficient of variables representing Factor 1,i.e., Wider Exposure, Quick Dissemination, and AudienceAccessibility are 0.692, 0.733, and 0.839, respectively(Column 2). Similarly, Factor 2 is being represented byReviewer Comments Posted and Counted Among QualityPublications whose coefficients are 0.836 and 0.705respectively (Table 7; Column 3).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
