แTABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
III. ISSUE PRESENTED
IV. RELEVANT FACTS
V. APPLICABLE CITY ORDINANCES
VI. ANALYSIS
A. Is Folkers Entitled to a Preliminary Injunction, Returning Possession of Cleo to Him While the Appeal is Pending?
1. Will Folkers suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction does not issue?
10
2. How Does the Harm Suffered by Folkers Balance Against the Injury that Granting an Injunction Would Inflict on Defendants?
14
3. What is the Probability that Folkers Will Succeed on the Merits?
14
4. Where Does the “Public Interest” Lie?
16
5. Summary
17
B. Is Folkers Entitled to a Preliminary Injunction, Prohibiting the City Council From Relying on the Third Alternative Definition of “Dangerous Dog?”
VII. SUMMARY
VIII. RECOMMENDATION