reduction, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario. Analysis of the GC scenario indicated that GHG emissions are projected to fall to 362.9 thousand tCO2e in 2020 and to 6060 thousand tCO2e in 2050, which represent a 0.3% and 4.4% reduction, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario. Analysis of the CGC scenario indicated that GHG emissions are projected to fall to 804.5 thou- sand TOE in 2020 and 15970.6 thousand tCO2e in 2050—figures that represent a 0.6% and 11.7% reduction, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario. Analysis of the PTS scenario indicated that GHG emissions are projected to fall to 6589.1 thousand tCO2e and
14881.7 thousand tCO2e in 2020 and 2050, respectively, which
represent a 5.3% and 10.9% reduction, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario. In the MS scenario, GHG emissions are projected to fall by 4248.7 thousand tCO2e in 2020 and 8617.3 thousand tCO2e in 2050; these figures represent a 3.4%, and 6.3% reduction, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario (Table 12).
Analysis of the “All without CGC” scenario indicated that GHG emissions are projected to fall by 26573.9 thousand tCO2e in 2020 and 70686.9 thousand tCO2e in 2050; these are 21.3% and 51.8% reductions, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario. Meanwhile, analysis of the “All without GC” scenario indicated that GHG emissions are projected to fall by 27015.5 thousand tCO2e in 2020 and 80597.4 thousand tCO2e in 2050; these figures represent a 21.6% and 59.1% reduction, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario (Fig. 7).