In the past, zoos were places where

In the past, zoos were places where we saw single animals in small, empty cages. Today zoos are changing in design; animals have more space, and some live in groups. Many zoos try to put animals in an environment that is similar to where they live in the wild. Some people who believe in animal rights argue against having zoos, because they think it is wrong to put animals in cager. I support the idea of having zoos, Because thry allow us to see wildanimals that we cannot see otherwise, and they help endangered species from becoming extinct.
The first reason for having zoos is that they allow prople to see wild animals that they could not see otherwise. Zoos are the only places for most prople who live in cities to see wild animals. Seeingwild animals on nature docjumentary programs or in books is not the same thing as seeing animals in real life. Zoos educate proplr about wild animals and teach them to understand and care about them. That is why there are school trips to the zoo. Where the zookeepers tell students about thr animals.
Secondly, many endangered species would become extinct if we did not have zoos. Zoos have saved numerous species from dying out or have helped animals get healthier and returned them backto the wild. For example, San Diego Zoo in California has special programs to save the giant pandas and white rhinoceroses. There is also a great deal of research that goes on in many zoos to study animal behavior.
In conclusion, zoos have a valuable role to play: they have an educational role and help to preserve certain species. It is important for animals to be treated well and kept in an environment which is as natural as possible. Many zoos today are responding to their critics and changing the way they keep animals so that they can continue their role without harming animals.

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 3:

In the past, zoos were places where we saw single animals in small, empty cages. Today zoos are changing in design; animals have more space, and some live in groups. Many zoos try to put animals in an environment that is similar to where they live in the wild. Some people who believe in animal rights argue against having zoos, because they think it is wrong to put animals in cager.ผมสนับสนุนความคิดของการมีสวนสัตว์ เพราะพวกเขาช่วยให้เราเพื่อดูว่าเราสามารถเห็นไวลด์ แอนิมอล มิฉะนั้น พวกเขาช่วยให้สัตว์ใกล้สูญพันธุ์จากการสูญพันธุ์ .
เหตุผลแรกมีสวนสัตว์ที่พวกเขาอนุญาตให้ loops.management เพื่อดูสัตว์ป่าที่พวกเขาไม่อาจเห็นเป็นอย่างอื่น สวนสัตว์เป็นสถานที่เฉพาะสำหรับส่วนใหญ่ loops.management ที่อยู่ในเมืองที่จะเห็นสัตว์ป่าseeingwild สัตว์บนโปรแกรม docjumentary ธรรมชาติหรือในหนังสือไม่เหมือนเห็นสัตว์ในชีวิตจริง สวนสัตว์ให้ proplr เกี่ยวกับสัตว์ป่า และ สอนให้เข้าใจ และดูแลเกี่ยวกับพวกเขา นั่นคือเหตุผลที่มีโรงเรียนไปเที่ยวสวนสัตว์ ที่ผู้ดูแลสัตว์บอกนักศึกษาเกี่ยวกับสัตว์ thr .
ประการหลายพันธุ์จะสูญพันธุ์ ถ้าเราไม่ได้มีสวนสัตว์ Zoos have saved numerous species from dying out or have helped animals get healthier and returned them backto the wild. For example, San Diego Zoo in California has special programs to save the giant pandas and white rhinoceroses. There is also a great deal of research that goes on in many zoos to study animal behavior.
In conclusion, zoos have a valuable role to play: they have an educational role and help to preserve certain species. It is important for animals to be treated well and kept in an environment which is as natural as possible. Many zoos today are responding to their critics and changing the way they keep animals so that they can continue their role without harming animals.