Future Research
This study indicates a need for more research on the impact of personalized information systems. Scholars in the public opinion and selective exposure literatures have argued that personalized systems may foster polarization. These result indicate that these fears might be overstated. Future studies should continue to focus on answering the questions raised in this debate as the information environment is unmistakably becoming more diverse and harder to control in systematic ways. People may also not be fully aware of the implications of some of their information habits, and these issues may become more prominent given further technological innovation. This study has demonstrated a link between personalized system use and increased news acquisition. Undeniably, news and public information have gotten more convenient and easier to access compared with the mass communication era. Questions remain about the quality and character of the information that people are finding, or that finds its way to them. Furthermore, this study does not speak to information-processing strategies that may or may not be used after news exposure.
Future studies should continue this work by focusing on establishing a causal relationship between personalized news system usage and increased news category and source exposure. Furthermore, more conclusive results could be found in over-time research studies investigating patterns of changing news-reading behaviors. For example, over-time research can help us understand exposure differences in more specific topics such as local news coverage and controversial news issues, which are both central concerns to a well-functioning democracy.
Future research should also focus on content exposure differences between personalized news users and nonusers. Political propaganda often begins with a kernel of information that is then interpreted in different ways by friends and critics. This feature of sectors of the information system, especially as communicated through social media, may help explain how people can report hearing the latest information about both their political friends and adversaries. What the information means to a given individual, or a group of individuals with a common viewpoint, however, is a more complex question that is not so readily answered without more research. The inadvertency thesis indicates that increased exposure through personalized systems could to increased inadvertent exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. On the other hand, selective filtering technologies may foster decreased exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. This research would be valuable in helping to answer questions about the overall diversity of content exposure when using personalized news systems. Last, it is important to continue to conduct research on filtering information systems because the diffusion of personalized communication technologies is pervasive and unstoppable.
งานวิจัยในอนาคต การศึกษานี้บ่งชี้ว่า จำเป็นสำหรับการวิจัยเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับผลกระทบของระบบสารสนเทศส่วนบุคคล นักวิชาการในมติมหาชนและ literatures แสงเลือกได้โต้เถียงส่วนบุคคลระบบอาจส่งเสริมให้มีการโพลาไรซ์ ผลเหล่านี้บ่งชี้ว่า ความกลัวเหล่านี้อาจเทียบกับใบสั่ง การศึกษาในอนาคตจะยังคงเน้นตอบคำถามที่ยกในการอภิปรายนี้เป็นสภาพแวดล้อมข้อมูลเพี้ยนเป็นหลากหลายมากขึ้น และยากที่จะควบคุมวิธีที่ระบบ คนอาจยังไม่ตระหนักของผลกระทบของพฤติกรรมข้อมูลของพวกเขา และปัญหาเหล่านี้อาจกลายเป็นโดดเด่นมากให้เพิ่มเติมเทคโนโลยีนวัตกรรม การศึกษานี้ได้สาธิตการเชื่อมโยงระหว่างการใช้ระบบส่วนบุคคลและการข่าวเพิ่มขึ้น ดี ๆ ข่าวและข้อมูลข่าวสารมีอากาศสะดวกขึ้น และง่ายต่อการเข้าเทียบกับยุคสื่อสารมวลชน ยังคงมีคำถามเกี่ยวกับคุณภาพ และลักษณะของข้อมูลที่ผู้คนกำลังค้นหา หรือที่ค้นหาทางไป นอกจากนี้ การศึกษานี้ไม่พูดคุยกับกลยุทธ์การประมวลผลสารสนเทศที่อาจ หรืออาจไม่ใช้งานหลังจากเปิดรับข่าวสาร Future studies should continue this work by focusing on establishing a causal relationship between personalized news system usage and increased news category and source exposure. Furthermore, more conclusive results could be found in over-time research studies investigating patterns of changing news-reading behaviors. For example, over-time research can help us understand exposure differences in more specific topics such as local news coverage and controversial news issues, which are both central concerns to a well-functioning democracy. Future research should also focus on content exposure differences between personalized news users and nonusers. Political propaganda often begins with a kernel of information that is then interpreted in different ways by friends and critics. This feature of sectors of the information system, especially as communicated through social media, may help explain how people can report hearing the latest information about both their political friends and adversaries. What the information means to a given individual, or a group of individuals with a common viewpoint, however, is a more complex question that is not so readily answered without more research. The inadvertency thesis indicates that increased exposure through personalized systems could to increased inadvertent exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. On the other hand, selective filtering technologies may foster decreased exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. This research would be valuable in helping to answer questions about the overall diversity of content exposure when using personalized news systems. Last, it is important to continue to conduct research on filtering information systems because the diffusion of personalized communication technologies is pervasive and unstoppable.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
