an effective human rights policy but not talk to the governments you don’t like is
counterproductive. Follow-though also means flexibility. If a policy of engagement with
a repressive regime is not working, like constructive engagement with South Africa, or if
a policy of isolation is producing little -- for example with Burma or Cuba --, there
should be a willingness to review these policies and consider alternatives.
CONCLUSION
To conclude, let me leave the audience with this thought: what the United States is
known and appreciated for around the world is not just its strong economy and military
capability. It is its democratic way of life and commitment to the observance of human
rights. Our nation defines itself by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the ending of
slavery and segregation, the promotion of equal rights for women, the struggle to end
racial and minority discrimination, and the defense of free speech, press, and civil
liberties. In its dealings with foreign governments and countries, it must necessarily
reflect this identity. Whether it is well expressed will depend upon the nature and strength
of its human rights policy and the dedication and skill of its diplomatic corps in the
implementation of this policy