What you were trying to do by taking up this approach and bringing up the Tsunami story to relate with it? Want to make it sound like Thailand is a betrayal against the world that once helped Thailand for disaster 2004? Squeeze emotion of the world people and create hatred of the passenger's relatives and some of your fans toward Thailand or just want to shift attention from something else? Or you just enjoy it so much because it is your personality?
The languages you use to report the news about Thailand is very bad picked, low-class and lacking of clarity professionalism or if it's your style, it is obviously very boring, predictable and dark.You said you didn't mean to stereotype all Thai to be jerk but the style you made is very informal that the thought of your intention to be professional and from fact is so hard to reach. It also doesn't show in-depth supportive and critical reason at all to make people think what could be reason behind that action of Thailand (Unless your target audience don't like to think at all). It is more like discussing with colleagues during lunch in a canteen.
One thing your should do is to keep this lower standard of you or even decrease it, and so you could be a good of bad example for the media industry to avoid this kind of ethic completely