I understand that you can not accept this claim, but what I try to explain to you is that .
1. Since we have shifted transition from the JUMP system to the CMMS system, we need to group all parts of the old system. Without not reference the invoice.
2. We use parts according to the confirmation system and the parts is called into use in conjunction with the parts new order.
3. We can not be sure that the parts of any invoice remaining. Until we are use the parts of our system migration runs out.
These is why we found abnormalities in a different period.
For claims 8D15017WS was rejected due to the claim deadline expired and I understood that this when request 8D report is not a problem when referring to the claims that previously.