It has also been argued that the eclectic paradigm insufficiently allows for differences in the strategic response of firms to any given configuration of OLI variables.
. At a given moment of time, the extent and pattern of MNE activity represents a point on a set of trajectories towards (or, for that matter, away from) their internationalisation path. That trajectory itself is set by the continuous and iterative interaction between the OLI configuration over successive time periods and the strategy of firms in response to these configurations that, in turn, will influence the OLI configuration in a subsequent moment of time. Let OLIt0 be the OLI configuration in time t0, OLIt1 the OLI configuration in time t1 , St-n the past (i.e. pre t0 ) strategies of firms still being worked out, and DSt0 ®t1 any change in the strategic response of firms to that configuration between time t0 and t1 . Then, ceteris paribus:
Later scholars have more explicitly introduced a time- and strategy-related dimension into their analysis. Again, reinterpreting Knickerbocker’s analysis in terms of the OLI paradigm, we may say that firms are prompted to go overseas, in part at least, because they consider their O advantages are (or could become) threatened, if they do not follow their competitors’ lead or because their advantages would be less without their presence.12 In other words, the strategy followed by firms in response to a given OLI configuration in time t0 is governed by their desire to protect or influence that configuration in t1 .
It has also been argued that the eclectic paradigm insufficiently allows for differences in the strategic response of firms to any given configuration of OLI variables. . At a given moment of time, the extent and pattern of MNE activity represents a point on a set of trajectories towards (or, for that matter, away from) their internationalisation path. That trajectory itself is set by the continuous and iterative interaction between the OLI configuration over successive time periods and the strategy of firms in response to these configurations that, in turn, will influence the OLI configuration in a subsequent moment of time. Let OLIt0 be the OLI configuration in time t0, OLIt1 the OLI configuration in time t1 , St-n the past (i.e. pre t0 ) strategies of firms still being worked out, and DSt0 ®t1 any change in the strategic response of firms to that configuration between time t0 and t1 . Then, ceteris paribus:Later scholars have more explicitly introduced a time- and strategy-related dimension into their analysis. Again, reinterpreting Knickerbocker’s analysis in terms of the OLI paradigm, we may say that firms are prompted to go overseas, in part at least, because they consider their O advantages are (or could become) threatened, if they do not follow their competitors’ lead or because their advantages would be less without their presence.12 In other words, the strategy followed by firms in response to a given OLI configuration in time t0 is governed by their desire to protect or influence that configuration in t1 .
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..