People™’s key competitors are largely made up of brands who produce fashion casual footwear
with athletic roots such as Vans, Converse, and Adidas. Modern athletic footwear that is worn for
comfort and fashion’s sake such as Nike, and traditional silhouettes made with modern materials
such as those from Crocs, Adidas, and Native Shoes are also competitors.
Vans and Converse have a core audience between 24-35, a segment of the market who grew up
wearing their shoes and have become lifelong fans. As a result, these two brands target their marketing
towards the 18-24 ages group in hopes of repeating this cycle. This target consumer is described
as creative, outgoing, stylish and young. The characteristics that generally make these two
shoes popular among consumers is their simple and slim style that goes with everything and every
body type, and the casual look they portray which allows them to be worn in almost any situation.
Crocs is a competitor in terms of product and pricing strategies but the least relevant in terms of
target market. The Crocs customer is older and less fashion conscious and likely to be outside of
the sphere of cultural influences. As People™ grows there will be an overlap of target markets, but
in the initial years it is unlikely the company will share similar retail positioning, especially in the
US.
In contrast to Native Shoes, the brand created prior by the founders of People Footwear™, People
is positioned as more sophisticated and technology driven brand. The similarities are reflected the
founders expert knowledge of injection-molding and their strong aesthetic designing and marketing
innovative footwear for young adults and a passion for the possibilities of injection-molding. Although
similar in nature, due to the brand having been created by thle same founders, the broader
design platform of People Footwear prepares the brand to evolve and adapt to market needs and
People™’s key competitors are largely made up of brands who produce fashion casual footwearwith athletic roots such as Vans, Converse, and Adidas. Modern athletic footwear that is worn forcomfort and fashion’s sake such as Nike, and traditional silhouettes made with modern materialssuch as those from Crocs, Adidas, and Native Shoes are also competitors.Vans and Converse have a core audience between 24-35, a segment of the market who grew upwearing their shoes and have become lifelong fans. As a result, these two brands target their marketingtowards the 18-24 ages group in hopes of repeating this cycle. This target consumer is describedas creative, outgoing, stylish and young. The characteristics that generally make these twoshoes popular among consumers is their simple and slim style that goes with everything and everybody type, and the casual look they portray which allows them to be worn in almost any situation.Crocs is a competitor in terms of product and pricing strategies but the least relevant in terms oftarget market. The Crocs customer is older and less fashion conscious and likely to be outside ofthe sphere of cultural influences. As People™ grows there will be an overlap of target markets, butin the initial years it is unlikely the company will share similar retail positioning, especially in theUS.In contrast to Native Shoes, the brand created prior by the founders of People Footwear™, Peopleis positioned as more sophisticated and technology driven brand. The similarities are reflected thefounders expert knowledge of injection-molding and their strong aesthetic designing and marketinginnovative footwear for young adults and a passion for the possibilities of injection-molding. Althoughsimilar in nature, due to the brand having been created by thle same founders, the broaderdesign platform of People Footwear prepares the brand to evolve and adapt to market needs and
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..