Although the debate about technology’s role in education has not been fully resolved, literally thousands of comparisons between computing and noncomputing classrooms, ranging from kindergarten to graduate school, have been made since the late 1960s. And not surprisingly, these studies have been meta-analyzed at intervals since then in an attempt to characterize the effects of new computer technologies as they emerged. More than 60 meta-analyses have appeared in the literature since 1980, each focusing on a specific question addressing different aspects such as subject matter, grade level, and type of technology. Although each of the published meta-analyses provides a valuable piece of information, no single one is capable of answering the overarching question of the overall impact of technology use on student achievement. This could be achieved by conducting a large-scale comprehensive meta-analysis covering various technologies, subject areas, and grade levels. However, such a task would represent a challenging and costly undertaking. Given the extensive number of meta-analyses in the field, it is more reasonable and more feasible to synthesize their findings. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to synthesize findings from meta-analyses addressing the effectiveness of computer technology use in educational contexts to answer the big question of technology’s impact on student achievement, when the comparison condition contains no technology use.