The same conclusion in virtually the same words was stated before the extensive
interviewing of Marcia, so it is unclear what the authors hoped to gain from grilling her. It is
also unclear to me how the interviewing of just one 3rd or 4th grader can possible be
considered “research” into anything at all. Surely this is a new world’s record for inadequate
sample size! However since nothing emerged after the interview with Marcia that was not
stated before the interview also, one cannot accuse the authors of extrapolating conclusions
from one interview. One can only accuse them of boring me utterly with endless details
about a pointless interrogation of one little girl.