Abstract
The definition of death within the new context of biotechnology as well as the definition of
euthanasia within the utilitarian society is problems that concern a multitude of areas such as
medicine, theology, philosophy and anthropology. The euthanasia of newborns differs from that
of adults, because the first case cannot benefit of the ‘quality of life’ argument. The author tries
to demonstrate that the ‘quality of life’ argument invoked for adults and transformed in ‘life
without value’ for newborns, it is false and unacceptable, because there cannot be a separation
between axiology and life. Furthermore, the Declaration of Geneva in 1948, signed by the
International Medical Association, bestows great responsibility over the medical act, mentioning
that any healthy professional ‘will maintain the greatest respect for human life starting from its
beginnings’.
AbstractThe definition of death within the new context of biotechnology as well as the definition ofeuthanasia within the utilitarian society is problems that concern a multitude of areas such asmedicine, theology, philosophy and anthropology. The euthanasia of newborns differs from thatof adults, because the first case cannot benefit of the ‘quality of life’ argument. The author triesto demonstrate that the ‘quality of life’ argument invoked for adults and transformed in ‘lifewithout value’ for newborns, it is false and unacceptable, because there cannot be a separationbetween axiology and life. Furthermore, the Declaration of Geneva in 1948, signed by theInternational Medical Association, bestows great responsibility over the medical act, mentioningthat any healthy professional ‘will maintain the greatest respect for human life starting from itsbeginnings’.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..