For survival men who are social animals would live in groups for a number of reasons ranging from protecting themselves from other tribes as mentioned, for fighting fierce animals such as tigers, for team hunting for big animals such as deer and whale and for public project such as building a bridge over a canal which had to be built by collaborative efforts. Last but not least would be the psychological need to live in a group. No person would want to live in isolation, save for some religious reason. Solitary confinement was dreaded by prisoners. But one fact of life was scarcity of resources. When lived in a group, men would fight for what was necessary for survival and would resort to force to get what they wanted. When lived in groups, there would be conflicts over four elements, economic interest, social status, power and things of abstract values. Economic interest was who would get what, how much and why others did not get the same amount. Social status conflict took place when a social hierarchy was established. Power involved who would call the shots regarding the former two. Things of abstract value were concerned, for example, with protests against putting up structure which would block the view of beautiful scenery. When bickering took place and the contentious issues turned to violence, it might threaten the very survival of the tribe. Homo sapiens are equipped with the a priori thinking and a posteriori thinking would come up with a solution. The solution would be taken by the strongest man or group of men to put a stop to the conflicts and came up with a setup known as a political order to force the community to live in forced harmony. The symbiotic relationship was made possible by the punitive measures meted out by the group that controlled power who set up rules for the community. Once that happened a state was born. Those who exercised state power were known as government and the process of governing was referred to as governance.