: 1. 04 to 5 . 40]) (see Figure 2). The adjusted odds ratios of nonadherence for each one SD increase in scale score was 2 . 27 (95% CI: 0.99 to 5.21) for DMSES, 1. 89 (95% CI: 0.76 to 4.70 ) for IHLC, and 1. 49 (95% CI : 0 . 71 to 3 .15) for MH . D i s c u s s i o n The results of this study of the relationship between patients’ perceptions of dialysis staff encouragement and fluid control adherence and the association between adherence and HBM components (such as self-effica- 12 – 10 – 7 – 5 – 2 – 0.0 – IWL/DW (%) | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 80 Figure 1 F r e q u e n cy of Av e r age Intradialytic Weight Loss (IWL)/Dry Weight (DW) (n = 72) N o t e : The dotted line indicates IWL/DW equals 5.7%. I W L / DW greater than 5.7% indicates nonadherence. N o t e s : DSE = dialysis staff encouragement, DMSES = dietary management self-efficacy scale, IHLC = internal health locus of