Is this plausible? If so, is it likely? Neither question can be answered easily, and there is a possible alternative explanation for the observed association. Urinary cadmium may simply be a marker of cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke.
Is this plausible? If so, is it likely?Neither question can be answeredeasily, and there is a possible alternativeexplanation for the observed association.Urinary cadmium may simply be amarker of cumulative exposure totobacco smoke.