well , let me deal with the second question. first,and if you are familiar with what we typically do , we don't have a kind of naive beginning from scratch and assumption that something that we observe has never happened before on the contrary , you could accuse our work of a kind of overdose of historical consciousness and too much of kind of retrospective consideration.
so of course , it's very close to infrastructural. but i think that it's a bit and i also explained it as such that there is the thinking in silicon valley , and the kind of interaction , and the kind of informality of the kind of work place of silicon valley. and yes , these are let's say infrastructural kind of results of some of their kind of thinking. but i think that to call it infrastructural is still not eliminating it from the architectural agenda. i think that , at this scale , and in this configuration , and i think that some of the kind of pictures or images. i showed you are really compelling in the sense that the degree of simultaneous inhabitation or emptiness which turns out to be completely charged , i've never seen before. so i presented modestly in that way. well , i think that , basically , we're going to travel in europe as a whole. whether it is rotterdam or friesland , which is only one hour apart , is not really relevant. i mean , once you're in europe , the two conditions will be completely accessible as there are almost everywhere there.