The interpretive sections under the personality disorder scales are divided into general interpretive descriptions, frequent code types, and treatment implications. Often, the descriptors are fairly severe and negative. Interpreters need to determine whether these apply to the individual client, based on how high the scale is elevated, implications of associated scale elevations, and additional data available on the client. For example, some of the descriptors might need to be “softened” if they are in the marginally elevated range (BR 75 to 80). More severe interpretations might be appropriate for extremely elevated scores or if the elevations are from either the Severe Personality Pathology or Severe Syndromes categories. Millon (1994) specifies that scores in the 75 to 84 range indicate the syndrome or pattern is present, whereas scores of 85 or above indicate that it is prominent. The general rule, then, is: The higher the elevation, the more likely that the interpretive descriptions are accurate. Another consideration is the height of elevated scales relative to other elevated scales. If they are approximately the same height, they should be given equal interpretive weight. On the other hand, if there are 20 or more BR points between scales, the lower scale’s influence is likely to be so subtle that it can be minimized or even ignored.