Reference is also made to paragraph 2 of the Claimant’s Request, asking the Tribunal to correct a misquotation that Mr. Suwit Suwan was authorized by the Claimant to serve the Respondent with a notice of alleged breaches. The Claimant is correct in pointing out that according to clause 7 of Mr. Suwit Suwan’s written statement, the notice of alleged breaches was sent to the Respondent by the law offices of Matsuo & Kosugi, and not by Mr. Suwit Suwan. Mr. Suwit Suwan merely helped Matsuo & Kosugi prepare such notice. I agree that paragraph 46 of the Award should be corrected accordingly.