Our results indicate that job satisfaction and turnover intention as work-related consequences are two examples of unintended individual-level consequences of an HRIS implementation. In this context of e-HRM consequences, Strohmeier (2009) concludes that prior research lacks an explicit concept of e-HRM consequences. These approaches (see Strohmeier, 2009 for an overview) indicate a low level of problem awareness in both research and practice regarding (un)intended consequences of HRIS implementations. Strohmeier (2009) identifies positive consequences of e-HRM such as reducing costs, speeding up processes, improving quality, and even gaining a more strategic role for HR within the organization. These examples of HRIS success can be classified as organizational consequences. He concludes that ‘‘besides expected and desired consequences e- HRM will also yield unexpected and undesired result’’ (p. 539) which thus far have not been the focus of research. Hence, he calls for research that raises the level of awareness regarding (un)intended consequences of HRIS implementation. Our research is a direct response to this conclusion, as we propose and evaluate the individual-level consequences of an HRIS implementation. In addition to organizational consequences (e.g., process improvements, strategic role of HR), implementation of an HRIS also influences individual level consequences such as job satisfaction and turnover intention. Thus, based on our results, we extend current HRIS- onsequences research by proposing individual-level consequences as a new dimension.