(standardized factor loadings ranged from .65 to .80), demonstrating clear distinction among the latent constructs included in this model. We compared the 3-factor model with multiple 2-factor models and a
1-factor model. All alternative models demonstrated significantly worse fit as indicated by the χ2 difference test. For example, the 1-factor model, in which all items loaded onto a single latent factor, demonstrated significantly worse fit, Δχ(3) = 153.04, p b .001. These results further supported the distinctiveness of the three proactive social behaviors.
(standardized factor loadings ranged from .65 to .80), demonstrating clear distinction among the latent constructs included in this model. We compared the 3-factor model with multiple 2-factor models and a1-factor model. All alternative models demonstrated significantly worse fit as indicated by the χ2 difference test. For example, the 1-factor model, in which all items loaded onto a single latent factor, demonstrated significantly worse fit, Δχ(3) = 153.04, p b .001. These results further supported the distinctiveness of the three proactive social behaviors.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..