The number of stage I follicles increased significantly
(P < 0.001) on day 50 compared to day 23 in the ANLexposed group (Fig. 3A). There was no statistically significant
difference in the number of stage II follicles on days 12 and 18
compared to day 1, whereas their number decreased
significantly (P < 0.001) on day 23 compared to day 1, and
day 18 in both experimental fish (Fig. 3B). The number of
these follicles was significantly (P < 0.001) lower on day 12
in fish exposed to ANL compared to that of the DNL group
and showed a decreasing trend after day 23 through day 50
(Fig. 3B). The stage III follicles were significantly
(P < 0.001) lower on day 12 compared to those on day 1,
but showed a progressive increase up to day 18 in both
experimental fish followed by a decrease on day 23 that was
not statistically significant (Fig. 3C). These follicles showed a
further decrease on day 50 in the ANL treatment group
(Fig. 3C). The mean number of stage IV follicles remained
low up to day 12, but showed a significant (P < 0.001)
increase on day 18 in both experimental fish (Fig. 3D).
However, these follicles declined significantly (P< 0.001) on
day 23 compared to those on day 18. Although the number
of these follicles did not show significant difference on day
50 compared to day 23, their number was significantly
(P < 0.001) lower compared to day 18 (Fig. 3D). While the
stage V follicles were found only on day 23 in the DNL treatment
group, few stage V follicles appeared on day 18 itself in
fish exposed to ANL, and their mean number was significantly
(P < 0.001) higher on day 23 compared to that of the DNL
group. However, a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in their
number was noticed on day 50 in the ANL treatment group
compared to day 23.
The number of stage I follicles increased significantly(P < 0.001) on day 50 compared to day 23 in the ANLexposed group (Fig. 3A). There was no statistically significantdifference in the number of stage II follicles on days 12 and 18compared to day 1, whereas their number decreasedsignificantly (P < 0.001) on day 23 compared to day 1, andday 18 in both experimental fish (Fig. 3B). The number ofthese follicles was significantly (P < 0.001) lower on day 12in fish exposed to ANL compared to that of the DNL groupand showed a decreasing trend after day 23 through day 50(Fig. 3B). The stage III follicles were significantly(P < 0.001) lower on day 12 compared to those on day 1,but showed a progressive increase up to day 18 in bothexperimental fish followed by a decrease on day 23 that wasnot statistically significant (Fig. 3C). These follicles showed afurther decrease on day 50 in the ANL treatment group(Fig. 3C). The mean number of stage IV follicles remainedlow up to day 12, but showed a significant (P < 0.001)increase on day 18 in both experimental fish (Fig. 3D).However, these follicles declined significantly (P< 0.001) onday 23 compared to those on day 18. Although the numberof these follicles did not show significant difference on day50 compared to day 23, their number was significantly(P < 0.001) lower compared to day 18 (Fig. 3D). While thestage V follicles were found only on day 23 in the DNL treatmentgroup, few stage V follicles appeared on day 18 itself infish exposed to ANL, and their mean number was significantly(P < 0.001) higher on day 23 compared to that of the DNLgroup. However, a significant (P < 0.001) decrease in theirnumber was noticed on day 50 in the ANL treatment groupcompared to day 23.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
