Figure 2 shows, for each land use category, to which extent the rain water harvested annually can contribute to
the irrigation requirement for the two scenarios. The values reported are computed in a simplistic manner by
considering that all the rain water harvested is stored without any limitation and applied on the fields without any
loss due to the efficiency of the irrigation system. The blue the bars depicts the share of irrigation requirement
satisfied by the rain water harvested. The lowest values are those from Scenario I, where RH can supply, in the best
case (horticulture), only 17% of the water requirements, and in the worst case (olive groves), only 2%. As far as
Scenario II is concerned, irrigation water is potentially provided by RH with higher percentages (e.g. 35% for
horticulture and 5% for olive groves).
Figure 2 shows, for each land use category, to which extent the rain water harvested annually can contribute tothe irrigation requirement for the two scenarios. The values reported are computed in a simplistic manner byconsidering that all the rain water harvested is stored without any limitation and applied on the fields without anyloss due to the efficiency of the irrigation system. The blue the bars depicts the share of irrigation requirementsatisfied by the rain water harvested. The lowest values are those from Scenario I, where RH can supply, in the bestcase (horticulture), only 17% of the water requirements, and in the worst case (olive groves), only 2%. As far asScenario II is concerned, irrigation water is potentially provided by RH with higher percentages (e.g. 35% forhorticulture and 5% for olive groves).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
