This study focuses the relative performance of concrete by normal sand and crushed stone and concrete by stone powder and stone chip. Same performance was evaluated using brick chip instead of stone chip. From the laboratory study, it can be concluded that stone powder is well appropriate for medium graded concrete for better
performance in terms of strength and economy over normal sand. Because for all the ratios of concrete using stone powder gives 14.76, 4 and 10.44%, increased value of compressive strength for the ratios of 1:1.5:3, 1:2:4 and 1:2.5:5 respectively from that of normal sand. Similarly for brick chip in all the ratios concrete givehigher compressive strength but less value than the stone chip concrete. For mortar, stone powder is well appropriate to choose it as an alternative of sand. The availability of the stone powder is limited and its price is not defined. If the stone powder can have a price value, it is not difficult to market it and use it as an alternative of sand. It is also seen from the study that the compressive strength of concrete made of brick chips is low comparingwith that of the concrete made of stone chip. This may be due to low quality brick chip, weak workmanship, and wrong proportions of mixing. But as brick chip is economical and available so normally for the low strength structures it can be used.