In general, most of the extracts evaluated for
antimicrobial activity were active against bacteria
and were almost completely inactive against fungi
(Table 2). Furthermore, the antimicrobial activity
of almost all of the dichloromethane extracts was
much stronger than the methanol extracts. The
dichloromethane extracts of A. rafflesiana showed
the most broad-spectrum activity, i.e. towards B.
substilis, MRSA, P. aeruginosa and A. ochraceous,
followed by the dichloromethane extracts of A.
mutica, A. nutans and Z. macroglossum against B.
substilis, MRSA and P. aeruginosa. The most
potent inhibitory activity of a dichloromethane
extract was shown by A. mutica with the MID of
125 mg per disc against both B. substilis and
MRSA.
In general, most of the extracts evaluated forantimicrobial activity were active against bacteriaand were almost completely inactive against fungi(Table 2). Furthermore, the antimicrobial activityof almost all of the dichloromethane extracts wasmuch stronger than the methanol extracts. Thedichloromethane extracts of A. rafflesiana showedthe most broad-spectrum activity, i.e. towards B.substilis, MRSA, P. aeruginosa and A. ochraceous,followed by the dichloromethane extracts of A.mutica, A. nutans and Z. macroglossum against B.substilis, MRSA and P. aeruginosa. The mostpotent inhibitory activity of a dichloromethaneextract was shown by A. mutica with the MID of125 mg per disc against both B. substilis andMRSA.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
