In a related context, Clorox challenged Procter & Gamble and Unilever in 1988 when it introduced the first bleach with detergent. Despite heavy investment, Clorox was only able to muster a 3 percent share and eventually, after Procter & Gamble had introduced Tide with Bleach, Clorox withdrew from the market. Clorox’s failure was at least partially due to the limiting meaning that the brand had for consumers as essentially a bleach product, which, although powerful, was perceived as caustic and potentially harmful to fabrics. On the other hand, the strength of these associations has enabled Clorox to extend successfully into the household cleaning products category, where the bleach ingredient is considered to be more relevant (Keller 1998, p. 478), creating such products as Clorox Wipes and Ready Mop. Interestingly, the extension may also have failed because, with a product like “laundry detergent with bleach,” laundry detergent is seen by consumers as the primary ingredient and bleach as the secondary ingredient. An extension from a brand with laundry detergent as an integral part of its primary meaning is thus more likely to find consumer acceptance than an extension from a brand the primary meaning of which is founded on bleach (ibid.).