Basically, Descartes and Locke were attempting to "discover" solutions to quite analogous problems, such as what knowledge specifically is, and the various factors that are involved in the process of acquiring said knowledge. Although they based their studies on similar issues, their approaches were quite different. For instance, Locke was a very pragmatic individual who centred his arguments around logic and reasoning. Believing that humans encompassed no innate ideas, he claimed that the mind was a "tabula rasa" or "blank slate". Our ideas and knowledge stem from sensation and reflection - in other words, personal experience. Descartes, however, asserted that the senses were key in obtaining knowledge, and human intellect is based on what is inherently within us from birth.
Basically, Descartes and Locke were attempting to "discover" solutions to quite analogous problems, such as what knowledge specifically is, and the various factors that are involved in the process of acquiring said knowledge. Although they based their studies on similar issues, their approaches were quite different. For instance, Locke was a very pragmatic individual who centred his arguments around logic and reasoning. Believing that humans encompassed no innate ideas, he claimed that the mind was a "tabula rasa" or "blank slate". Our ideas and knowledge stem from sensation and reflection - in other words, personal experience. Descartes, however, asserted that the senses were key in obtaining knowledge, and human intellect is based on what is inherently within us from birth.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
