This type of feedback influences the writer’s or speaker’s revisions in a different way from an evaluative critique. For example, if different peer reviewers identify different theses, then the creator knows that she didn’t make herself fully understood and will have to make her thesis statement clearer. She might even add a sentence or two stating what she isn’t arguing. Similarly, if most of the reviewers miss a main point, a key justification, or an important piece of evidence, she knows that part of her message was overlooked and needs more emphasis. Of course, less attentive students may miss some points that were made quite clearly, just as members of any audience read or listen carelessly and miss important points of a news story, article, or speech. This reality should drive home to students the importance not only of expressing themselves clearly but also of attracting and holding their audience’s interest.