cused, and overview perspectives lack the detail needed to guide researchers.
In 1992 the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)
established a “Study Group on Stock Identification Protocols for Finfish and
Shellfish Stocks” to review methodologies of stock identification and develop
a protocol for the application of stock identification results. The support of
this work by the ICES community reflects the continuing leadership of ICES
in oceanographic and fishery research. Coincidentally, it was an ICES committee
that first promoted stock identification as an important consideration for
fishery science in the early 1900s. The ICES Study Group was
organized in an open format to invite a wide participation of experts on stock
identification to summarize the various approaches. Over the following
decade, the group expanded to the “Study Group on Stock Identification Methodology”
and developed a volume of contributions to review each existing
method, with emphasis on recent advances, review of benchmark case
studies, critique of strengths and weaknesses, and guidance for effective protocols.
The compilation provided the basis for the first edition of this book
(Cadrin et al., 2005). The compendium of methodological reviews was
designed to serve as a resource for researchers interested in comparative
studies in stock identification as well as a general introduction for all scientists
and managers of natural resources. Methodological chapters were not necessarily
comprehensive reviews but focused more on historical development,
benchmark case studies, critique of current issues, and prescriptions for the
most effective protocols for stock identification
cused, and overview perspectives lack the detail needed to guide researchers.In 1992 the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)established a “Study Group on Stock Identification Protocols for Finfish andShellfish Stocks” to review methodologies of stock identification and developa protocol for the application of stock identification results. The support ofthis work by the ICES community reflects the continuing leadership of ICESin oceanographic and fishery research. Coincidentally, it was an ICES committeethat first promoted stock identification as an important consideration forfishery science in the early 1900s. The ICES Study Group wasorganized in an open format to invite a wide participation of experts on stockidentification to summarize the various approaches. Over the followingdecade, the group expanded to the “Study Group on Stock Identification Methodology”and developed a volume of contributions to review each existingmethod, with emphasis on recent advances, review of benchmark casestudies, critique of strengths and weaknesses, and guidance for effective protocols.The compilation provided the basis for the first edition of this book(Cadrin et al., 2005). The compendium of methodological reviews wasdesigned to serve as a resource for researchers interested in comparativestudies in stock identification as well as a general introduction for all scientistsand managers of natural resources. Methodological chapters were not necessarilycomprehensive reviews but focused more on historical development,benchmark case studies, critique of current issues, and prescriptions for themost effective protocols for stock identification
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
