Alternative media’s outreach and teach interactivity occurs in the public sphere. Jurgen Habermas (1974) suggests that this public space promotes democratic problem solving through dialogue and deliberation, and often the tolerance to respectfully agree to disagree. The public sphere of alternative media may be an appropriate setting for deliberative communication and a social learning process involving both consensus and compromise. Discomfort and disagreement are necessary elements of this learning praxis, and its outcomes motivate ongoing communication that often regenerates and perpetrates more communication projects and more media documentation. The documented projects, coalitions and political initiatives that arise are socially interactive processes that Habermas refers to as “communicative action” (Deetz, 2001). Dialogue motivates problem-solving, and involves individual voices whose collective interests lead to taking action in the public sphere.