Because public space can take multiple forms as an economic
entity, much of the research adopting this perspective considers
the origins and financing of public space. In the past, through
such public works programmes as Roosevelt’s ‘new deal’, the
majority of public space was provided by the state and funded
through public expenditure (Leighninger, 1996). However, in
recent years, the creation of public space has increasingly been
left to private developers. In some cases, developers are induced
to provide public spaces through zoning laws that allow denser
development in exchange for more street-level open space,
although, as Loukaitou-Sideris and Banerjee (1993) found by
comparing San Francisco and Los Angeles, there is much
variation in how these arrangements play outrally
Because public space can take multiple forms as an economicentity, much of the research adopting this perspective considersthe origins and financing of public space. In the past, throughsuch public works programmes as Roosevelt’s ‘new deal’, themajority of public space was provided by the state and fundedthrough public expenditure (Leighninger, 1996). However, inrecent years, the creation of public space has increasingly beenleft to private developers. In some cases, developers are inducedto provide public spaces through zoning laws that allow denserdevelopment in exchange for more street-level open space,although, as Loukaitou-Sideris and Banerjee (1993) found bycomparing San Francisco and Los Angeles, there is muchvariation in how these arrangements play outrally
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..