These levels of contamination were selected for two purposes: to enable
quantitative monitoring of Salmonella inactivation and to be relevant
inoculum levels. According to Straver et al. (2007) and to tests
performed on naturally contaminated products in the present study,
10 cfu/g is considered a plausible level of contamination of poultrybased
meat preparations available on the market, while 100 and
1000 cfu/g represented the intermediate and worst case scenarios, respectively,
in which Salmonella, after accidental contamination (at low
levels of b1–10/g), had already multiplied due to prior storage under
temperature abuse (Roccato et al., 2012).
These levels of contamination were selected for two purposes: to enablequantitative monitoring of Salmonella inactivation and to be relevantinoculum levels. According to Straver et al. (2007) and to testsperformed on naturally contaminated products in the present study,10 cfu/g is considered a plausible level of contamination of poultrybasedmeat preparations available on the market, while 100 and1000 cfu/g represented the intermediate and worst case scenarios, respectively,in which Salmonella, after accidental contamination (at lowlevels of b1–10/g), had already multiplied due to prior storage undertemperature abuse (Roccato et al., 2012).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..