The prevalence of LBW declined throughout 1990-2000 and has remained at 8-9%.
23,14
Data from MICS 2006, which included 98.7% of babies weighed at birth, showed that LBW prevalence was 9.2% with no significant difference by residential area and maternal education. There was a slight difference between poor and rich households (10% vs 8.5%, respectively). In some remote areas, very high prevalences of LBW (i.e., 20-25%) were observed.
The prevalence of LBW declined throughout 1990-2000 and has remained at 8-9%.23,14Data from MICS 2006, which included 98.7% of babies weighed at birth, showed that LBW prevalence was 9.2% with no significant difference by residential area and maternal education. There was a slight difference between poor and rich households (10% vs 8.5%, respectively). In some remote areas, very high prevalences of LBW (i.e., 20-25%) were observed.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..