First of all, we should know that who make the problem/ delay of this routing.
We should terminate them since they could not do the good service !
Remark :-
1. SUN inter no more since they could not run 2 trips/truck/day ( morning for P&G and afternoon for Ricoh), we should terminate from P&G routing.
2. PST_Tran, they supported Grohe and them customer, always drivers not available, we should terminate from P&G routing.
3. Nava is too small fleet, we should terminate from P&G routing.
5. Prasertsri, small fleet as well, we should terminate from P&G routing or keep for back up only.
4. Jubilant is new comer who preferred to be HWL's implant truck controller at LCH office,
I plan to keep them to support Ricoh = 15-20 cont/day + SIG = 10 conts/day + Ever Spring = ???/day in future.
5. BMT is our old fleet, they support P&G and our customers at Amata city,
I plan to keep them to support Ricoh = 15-20 cont/day + SIG = 10 conts/day + Ever Spring = ???/day in future.
The time is changed, we need to improve our trucking operations, cost & service levels.
I propose to assign SPL to handle P&G project as same as Grohe operation by PST_Tran before. The reason because SPL new comer has 52 fleets available at LCH area, the cost is competitive.
We can do internal meeting with our term by next Monday 10.00 am at BKK office then call SPL come to attend the meeting with us per our aspect and assignment next week at LCH or BKK office,