This is a case essentially of partnerships towards learning. The partners were indirectly involved in the teaching in that they provide the resources or knowledge to support the teachers at the school. For example, the community partner (Fantasy Garden) provided a physical opportunity for students to explore physics. The Texas Instrument Company was willing to contribute equipment and advice which eventually will afford improved learning opportunities, but clearly were motivated commercially to be a partner. This partnership was negotiated at the local level with key personnel in the school driving the negotiations. In Walsh’s description, the partnership was the responsibility of personnel at the local level. Strategic planning also occurred at the local level in that the roles of partners were well articulated and did not involve direct engagement with students. However, there is little evidence however of the level animation, facilitation and capacity building as processes for implementation. There was passive facilitation on the part of the Fantasy Garden partner and long term capacity building on the part of teachers, but these were flow-on effects of the partnership.